 |
107th Congress
Session I | Session II
Report: Consideration of the Nomination of Elias A. Zerhouni,
M.D., to be the Director of the National Institutes of HealthHearing
Before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
PensionsApril 30, 2002
Members Present
Senators Edward Kennedy (D-MA), Chairman; Judd Gregg (R-NH),
Ranking Minority Member; Barbara Mikulski (D-MD); Paul Sarbanes
(D-MD); John Warner (R-VA); and Paul Wellstone (D-MN).
Witnesses
Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., Nominee to be Director of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH).
Also in attendance were Ruth Kirschstein, M.D., Acting Director
of NIH,
and Yvonne Maddox, Ph.D., Acting Deputy Director of NIH.
Purpose of Hearing: To consider the nomination of
Dr. Zerhouni to be the Director of NIH.
Summary
The Members of the Committee expressed unanimous support
for Dr. Zerhouni. Senator Kennedy predicted an expeditious
confirmation, including a vote by the full Senate, possibly
before the end of the week. All of the Members, joined by
Dr. Zerhouni, applauded the stewardship of Dr. Kirschstein.
Topics discussed during the hearing included the following:
- Ensuring that NIH
budget increases are well spent.
- Diabetes research.
- Increase in life expectancy.
- Human subjects protection.
- Clinical trials.
- Stem cells.
- Recruitment, training and retention of biomedical researchers.
- Cross-cutting research initiatives.
- Translational research.
- Disease prevention.
- The National Institute of Bioimaging and Bioengineering.
- Mental health research.
- A molecular library.
Opening Statements
The Members made brief opening statements expressing support
for Dr. Zerhouni and recognizing the importance of the work
of NIH
to the American public. Chairman Kennedy said Dr. Zerhouni
would be the "first NIH
Director of the century." He called Dr. Zerhouni a "living
example of the American dream."
Dr. Zerhouni was introduced to the Committee by his home-state
Senators, Barbara Mikulski and Paul Sarbanes. They described
his life and career, including his upbringing and education
in Algeria and his remarkable rise to become a department
head at Johns Hopkins Medical School. Senator Sarbanes quoted
the President of Johns Hopkins, who said the following about
Dr. Zerhouni:
"One who often sees solutions clearly when others see problems...keeps
an open mind, unencumbered by the biases of others."
Dr. Zerhouni introduced his family and friends sitting in
the audience. He called NIH
the country's leader of biomedical science. He said his experience
has taught him that he can succeed as a leader by inspiring
others and involving all fields of science. Dr. Zerhouni stated
three views of the future of biomedical research:
- "I have become convinced that only further fundamental
discovery will allow us to meet the health care challenges
facing us."
- "We need to bring the fruits of research to clinical testing
more rapidly and enhance our ability to prevent and detect
disease much earlier."
- "I believe that biomedical research is at an important
turning point that may require new strategies."
Dr. Zerhouni cited the DNA chip as an example of the quickening
pace of technological advances and how its development will
speed the process of scientific discovery. He also discussed
how a single cell, smaller than the tip of a needle, contains
all human DNA as well as the entire molecular machinery necessary
to transcribe and translate DNA into all the complex networks
of molecules that make humans function the way they do. Now
that these discoveries have been made, "We need to go on a
journey to understand how all these parts fit together in
health and in disease: this is by far the most formidable
scientific problem ever faced by mankind." He talked about
the need to recruit the best talent to undertake this journey.
Dr. Zerhouni mentioned the tension between science and society
as discoveries raise ethical issues. He said disease knows
no politics. The Director of NIH
should "not be made to be factional, but must always remain
factual." In functioning this way, he will comply with Administration
policy and Federal law.
Dr. Zerhouni said he was instrumental in creating an Institute
for Stem Cell Engineering at Johns Hopkins "primarily because
I was concerned about the lack of any Federal funding to advance
the fundamental research still needed in this promising but
fledgling field." He called the stem cell policy implemented
by President Bush an important advance because it allows Federal
funding of stem cell research.
Dr. Zerhouni vowed to manage the substantial resources of
NIH
effectively. He concluded his statement with an impassioned
observation: "As an immigrant, I am deeply touched by being
here today, because it says about our great country what no
other country can say about itself."
Questions
Senator Kennedy
- What are your goals? Dr. Zerhouni said he wanted to recruit
key people to important vacancies at NIH.
He also said he wanted to increase understanding of the
dynamics of research.
- Do you plan any changes in the direction of NIH?
Dr. Zerhouni said cross-cutting initiatives should be encouraged,
that he wanted to identify obstacles to science, and that
translational research should be widened. He has no specific
plans of action at this time.
- In light of the political debate about stem cells and
cloning, can you assure the Committee that you will be objective?
Dr. Zerhouni said he believes science should be "open and
transparent."
- There have been problems in protecting human subjects.
How do you see the role of NIH
in human subjects protection? Dr. Zerhouni said this was
an important issue. He noted that there had been a tragedy
involving a volunteer at Hopkins. He said there needed to
be a change in the culture of clinical trials and that it
should begin with the training of physicians.
- How can NIH
strengthen clinical research? Dr. Zerhouni said this was
an important challenge. He remarked that clinical trials
are more difficult than people realize and that clinical
science does not get enough support. He will look at the
total system at NIH.
He believes a pool of clinical researchers is needed.
- What is NIH's
role in the area of disease prevention? Dr. Zerhouni said
NIH
must have a role. He said many diseases are self-inflicted.
He used the example of diabetes, which he called a pandemic.
"How we research behavior modification will be a key," he
said.
- What is your vision of the new NIBIB? Dr. Zerhouni noted
that he is a radiologist. He called the work of the new
Institute profound and crosscutting. He said disease-driven
research needs to be rethought in light of new technologies,
such as nanotechnology. He said a more appropriate name
for the new Institute might be the Institute for Emerging
Biotechnology.
- I understand you have thought about the establishment
of a molecular library. Tell us about it. Dr. Zerhouni said
the lack of access to molecular material limits the pace
of research. He suggested that a national resource for molecules
is needed. A library is an idea he has thought about.
Senator Mikulski
- How will you "operationalize" NIH?
Dr. Zerhouni said he believes research can be improved at
the margin. He suggested that one way of improving health
care is prevention. He said he was interested in funding
research that identified the pathways to disease and cited
cancer as an example.
- Do you have any strategies for clinical research that
would result in more rapid testing of potential products?
Dr. Zerhouni said we need to identify faster pathways from
discoveries to clinical testing. He said the convergence
of science requires rethinking about how to proceed. He
noted that access to biological samples is an impediment
to research.
- How do you improve the recruitment and retention of top
scientists, particularly minorities? Dr. Zerhouni said statistics
show the composition of scientists to be more diverse at
the educational and training levels. He said we train but
do not retain. He said we need role models to attract a
more diverse staff at NIH.
- I understand that you established the Institute for Stem
Cell Engineering at Johns Hopkins because you were concerned
about the lack of Federal funding for stem cell research.
Are Federal funds now sufficient? Dr. Zerhouni responded
that scientists were shying away from promising research
because of the lack of funding. "I think Federal funding
is needed because, without it, progress wasn't taking place."
Senator Wellstone
- The Muscular Dystrophy Care Act was based on an estimate
that NIH
should spend $56 million a year on muscular dystrophy research.
Yet, NIH
is spending only $25.4 million. I am disappointed. Do you
believe NIH
is committed to this area of research? Dr. Zerhouni said
he wanted to understand the total requirements of the Act.
He said, "My heart is where you are."
- Will you meet with the parents of children with muscular
dystrophy? Dr. Zerhouni said he would.
- Are you committed to research on mental health and substance
abuse? Dr. Zerhouni said the impact of mental health problems
is a significant burden to society. He said all social sciences
need to be better understood.
- I understand that Parkinson's disease is potentially the
most curable brain disorder and that stem cell research
could lead to a cure. Are the 78 lines available for federally
funded research under the President's policy sufficient,
or should there be greater diversity? Will you recommend
changes in the President's policy if you determine that
the lines are not sufficient? Dr. Zerhouni responded that
a lot of fundamental research on stem cells needs to be
conducted, and this will be possible under the President's
policy. Dr. Zerhouni made assurances that if it becomes
evident that pathways are available for treatment using
stem cells, he would be the first to compile the information
and distribute it to the public.
Prepared by Marc Smolonsky, OD/OLPA, May 1,
2002
|
 |